Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Beasiswa KIP Kuliah Menggunakan Metode SAW dengan Pembobotan Kriteria Akademik dan Kondisi Ekonomi Mahasiswa

Laura; Yaslinda Lizar

doi:10.51353/0t6wwh51

Authors

Laura UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
Yaslinda Lizar UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51353/0t6wwh51

Keywords:

Decision Support System, Scholarship, Simple Additive Weighting, Decision Making, Scholarship Selection

Abstract

The scholarship recipient selection process requires an assessment mechanism capable of accommodating multiple criteria in a fair and measurable manner. The large number of applicants and the variety of factors considered often make the selection process complex when conducted manually. Such conditions may lead to subjectivity and inconsistencies in decision-making. This study aims to develop a Decision Support System (DSS) to assist in selecting scholarship recipients by applying the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. The SAW method was chosen because it can process multiple criteria that have been assigned weights according to their level of importance, thereby generating preference values that can be used as the basis for determining scholarship recipients. The criteria used in this study include Grade Point Average (GPA), parents’ income, number of dependents in the family, student achievements, and attendance records. Data were collected through the distribution of questionnaires to 30 respondents to obtain information regarding the relevance and importance of each criterion. The results indicate that the implementation of the SAW method can systematically rank scholarship candidates based on the highest preference values. Therefore, the developed system can support a more efficient, objective, and accountable scholarship selection process.

References

[1] J. G. T. Pranoto, D. Pebrianti, M. Darwis, Yaddarabullah, and E. D. Krishnasari, "Selection of Education Assistance Recipients Based on AHP and SAW," in 2022 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA), Surabaya, Indonesia, 2022, pp. 163–168, doi: 10.1109/ISITIA56226.2022.9855329.

[2] S. Kusumadewi, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Model dan Proses Pengambilan Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2016.

[3] E. Turban, R. Sharda, and D. Delen, Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems, 10th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2015.

[4] D. Nofriansyah and S. Defit, Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2017.

[5] T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode dan Implementasi. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.

[6] A. S. Rosa and M. Shalahuddin, Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak Terstruktur dan Berorientasi Objek. Bandung: Informatika, 2018.

[7] I. Sommerville, Software Engineering, 10th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2016.

[8] R. S. Pressman and B. R. Maxim, Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, 8th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2019.

[9] A. Kadir, Pengenalan Sistem Informasi. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 2017.

[10] M. Muslihudin and Oktafianto, Analisis dan Perancangan Sistem Informasi Menggunakan Model Terstruktur dan UML. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2016.

[11] F. Riandari, "Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Beasiswa Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)," Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 120–128, 2020.

[12] R. Yunitarini, "Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting untuk Pemilihan Penerima Beasiswa," Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Asia, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 95–102, 2019.

[13] M. Iqbal, A. Setiawan, and L. Pratama, "Penerapan Metode SAW pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Beasiswa," Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 512–520, 2022.

[14] A. Nugroho and D. Prasetyo, "Implementation of Decision Support System for Scholarship Selection Using SAW Method," Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 55–63, 2023.

[15] K. P. Fishburn, “Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Sets: Application to Priorities and Assignments,” Operations Research, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 537–542, 2017.