Melampaui Dua Rezim: Analisa Politik Pemikiran Keislaman Nurcholish Madjid

Fachry Ali

doi:10.51353/jpb.v3i2.906

Penulis

Fachry Ali Pendiri dan Peneliti Senior Lembaga Studi dan Pengembangan Etika Usaha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51353/jpb.v3i2.906

Kata Kunci:

Nurcholish Madjid, political analysis, Embedded Intellectualism

Abstrak

This research investigates the political analysis of Nurcholish Madjid's Islamic thought, transcending the confines of two dominant regimes: conservatism and secularism. The paper poses a pivotal question regarding Madjid's intellectual journey in the socio-political context of Indonesia, particularly considering the absence of the New Order regime. By examining Madjid's embedded intellectualism, the study explores how historical contexts shape his Islamic perspectives, highlighting fundamental shifts influenced by pre- and post-New Order periods.

Referensi

Ahmad Syafii Maarif, “Cak Nur, Sahabatku: Mengapa Cepat Pergi?”, pengantar buku Muhammad Wahyuni Nafis, Cak Nur, Guru Bangsa, hlm. xix.

Ahmad Syafii Maarif, Studi tentang Percaturan dalam Konstituante: Islam dan Masalah Kenegaraan (Jakarta: LP3ES, 1985).

Andrew Rosser, The Politics of Economic Liberalization: State, Market and Power (Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press, 2002), hlm. 36.

Ann Kull, Piety and Politics: Nurcholish Madjid and his Interpretation of Islam in Modern Indonesia (Lund, Sweden: Department of History and Anthropology of Religions Lund University, 2005), hlm. 45.

Bahtiar Effendy, Islam and the State in Indonesia (Singapore: ISEAS, 2003), hlm. 71.

Bahtiar Effendy, Islam and the State, hlm. 73.

Deliar Noer, “Harun Nasution dan Perkembangan Pemikiran Islam”, dalam Panitia Penerbitan Buku dan Seminar 70 Tahun Harun Nasution, Refleksi Pembaharuan Pemikiran Islam: 70 Tahun Harun Nasution (Jakarta: Elsaf, 1989), hlm. 92.

Deliar Noer, “Harun Nasution dan Perkembangan Pemikiran Islam”, hlm. 101.

Dikutip Muhammad Hari Zamharir, Agama dan Negara: Analisis Kritis Pemikiran Politik Nurcholish Madjid (Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada, 2004), hlm. 97.

Dikutip Taufik Abdullah, “Sarjana Asing tentang Islam di Minangkabau”, dalam Taufik Abdullah, Islam dan Masyarakat:Pantulan Sejarah Indonesia (Jakarta: LP3ES, 1987), hlm. 216.

Diringkas dari penjelasan Greg Barton, Gagasan Islam Liberal di Indonesia, hlm. 90-92.

Donald K. Emerson, Indonesia’s Elite: Political Culture and Cultural Politics (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1976), hlm. 20.

Dorodjatun Kuntjoro-Jakti, “The Political Economy of Development: The Case of Indonesia under the New Order Government, 1966-1978”, Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley, 1981.

Edward W. Said, Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient (London W5 TZ: Penguin Books, 1978), hlm. 20.

Fachry Ali, “Lima Puluh Tahun HMI Ciputat: Sebuah Narasi tentang Warisan Intelektual”, dalam Rusydy Zakaria, Idris Thaha dan Eko Arisandi, (eds.), Membingkai Perkaderan Intelektual: Setengah Abad HMI Cabang Ciputat (Ciputat: UIN Jakarta Press, 2012), hlm. xxvii-xxviii.

Fachry Ali, “Menolak Menjadi Heidegger: Pemikiran Politik dan Demokrasi Muhammad Natsir”, makalah yang disampaikan dalam Seminar Nasional Membedah Pemikiran Politik M. Natsir, Kerja sama UII dengan Panitia Peringatan Refleksi Seabad Pemikiran dan Perjuangan M. Natsir, Yogyakarta, 10 Juni 2008.

George McTurnan Kahin, Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1970), hlm. 156-57.

Greg Barton, Gagasan Islam Liberal di Indonesia: Pemikiran Neo-Modernisme Nurcholish Madjid, Djohan Effendi, Ahmad Wahib dan Abdurrahman Wahid, terjemahan Nanang Tahqiq, disunting Edy A. Effendi (Jakarta: Paramadina dan Pustaka Antara, 1999), hlm. 78.

Herbert Feith, The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1964), hlm. 540.

Ian Austin, Pragmatism and Public Policy in East Asia: Origins, Adaptations and Developments (Singapore: Fairmont International Private Limited, 2001).

Jamie Mackie, “Indonesia: Economic Growth and Depoliticization”, dalam James W. Morley, (ed.), Driven by Growth: Political Change in the Asia-Pacific Region, Revised Edition (Singapore: ISEAS, 1999), hlm. 123.

Joel S. Migdal, Strong Societies and Weak State: State-Society Relations and State Capabalities in the Third World (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1988).

Karl D. Jackson, “Bureaucratic Polity: A Theoretical Framework for the Analysis of Power and Communications in Indonesia”, dalam Karl D. Jackson and lucyan W. Pye, (eds.), Political Power and Communications in Indonesia (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 1978), hlm. 3-22.

Lihat Andrew Gamble, The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 2XS and London: McMilland Education, Ltd., 1989).

Masjumi of North Sumatra, “Welcoming the Social Revolution, hlm. 56.

Masjumi of North Sumatra, “Welcoming the Social Revolution” (1946), dalam Herbert Feith and Lance Castles, (eds.), Indonesian Political Thinking, 1945-1965 (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1972), hlm. 45-55.

Mochtar Lubis, “Party Confusion in Indonesia”, Far Eastern Survey, Ocktober 29, 1952.

Muhammad ‘Immanuddin ‘Abdurrahim, Kuliah Tauhid (Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2002), hlm. 28-29.

Muhammad Natsir, “Pidato Mohammad Natsir” (Pertama), dalam Muhammad Natsir, et-al, Debat Dasar Negara Islam dan Pancasila: Konstituante 1957 (Jakarta: Pustaka Panjimas, 2001), hlm. 34.

Muhammad Natsir, “Restoring Confidence in Democracy” (1956), dalm Hebert Feith and Lance Castles, (eds.), Indonesian Political Thinking, hlm. 91.

NDP-HMI, dalam Solichin, HMI: Candradimuka Mahasiswa, hlm. 243.

NDP-HMI, dalam Solichin, HMI: Kawah Candradimuka Mahasiswa, hlm. 243. Hurup miring adalah tambahan.

Nilai-nilai Dasar Perjuangan (NDP)-HMI. Naskah ini dimuat secara utuh dalam Solichin, HMI: Candradimuka Mahasiswa (Jakarta: Sinergi Persadanatama Foundation, 2010), hlm. 255-56.

Nurcholish Madjid, Isyu Modernisasi di Kalangan Muslim Indonesia, hlm. 27.

Nurcholish Madjid, Isyu Modernisasi di Kalangan Muslim Indonesia, hlm. 4.

Nurcholish Madjid, Isyu Modernisasi di Kalangan Muslim Indonesia, hlm. 17. Huruf miring adalah tambahan.

Nurcholish Madjid, Isyu Modernisasi di Kalangan Muslim Indonesia, hlm. 28. Huruf miring adalah tambahan.

Nurcholish Madjid, Isyu Modernisasi di Kalangan Muslim Indonesia: Pandangan Seorang Partisipan, terjemahan Ihsan Ali Fauzi (Ciputat: LAPMI HMI Ciputat dan Formaci, 1988), hlm. 24-25. Tulisan ini berasal dari “The Issue of Modernization Among Muslims in Indonesia: From Participant’s Point of View”, dalam Gloria Davis, (ed.), What is Modern Indonesian Culture? (Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1979).

Prawoto Mangkusasmito, “Jiwa dan Semangat 1945 Masyumi Menolak Suatu ‘Matchsstaat’”, dalam S. U. Bayusut dan Lukman Hakiem, Prawoto Mankusasmito: Ketua Umum (Terakhir) Partai Masyumi (Jakarta: Kompas, 2014), hlm. 92.

Richard Robison, Indonesia: The Rise of Capital (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1986).

Samuel P. Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1968).

Sulindo, 12 Maret 1965.

Taufik Abdullah, “Sarjana Asing tentang Islam di Minangkabau”, hlm. 224.

Tentang hal ini, lihat Buyung Nasution, “The Aspiration for Constituional Government in Indonesia: A Socio-Legal Study of the Indonesian Constituante, 1956-1959”, disertasi untuk de Rijkuniversiteit te Utrech, 1992.

Tentang hal ini, lihat Ralp Anspach, “Indonesia”, dalam Frank H. Golay, et-al, Underdevelopment and Economic Nationalism in Southeast Asia (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1969), hlm. 111-202.

Tentang hal ini, lihat Ruth T. McVey, “The Beamtenstaat in Indonesia”, dalam Benedict R. O’G Anderson and Audrey Kahin, (eds.), Interpreting Indonesian Politics: Thirteen Contributions to the Debate (Ithaca: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1982), hlm. 84-91.

Tentang hal ini,lihat Brian May, The Indonesian Tragedy (Singapore: Grahm Brash [PTE] LTD, 1978). Juga Hamish McDonald, Demokrasi: Indonesia in the 21st Century (New York: Palgrave, 2015).

Tentang ini, lihat Benedict R. O’G Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1983).

Tentang PRRI, lihat, antara lain, Fachry Ali, “The Revolts of the Nation-State Builders: A Comparative Study of the Acehnese Darul Islam and the West Sumatran PRRI Rebellions (1953-1962)”, Tesis MA, Monash University, 1994.

Tentang revolusi sosial Sumatera Utara itu, lihat Anthony Reid, The Blood of the People: Revolution and the End of Traditional Rule in North Sumatra (Kuala Lumpur et-all: Oxford University Press, 1979).

Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second Edition (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1970), hlm. viii.

Ulasan menyeluruh tentang ini, lihat Deliar Noer, Mohammad Hatta: Biografi Politik (Jakarta: LP3ES, 1990).

Ulasan selanjutnya, lihat A. Dahlan Ranuwihardjo, Bung Karno dan HMI dalam Pergulatan Sejarah: Mengapa Bung Karno Tidak Membubarkan HMI, disunting Viva Yoga Mauladi (Jakarta: Intrans, 2002).

Untuk latarbelakang pemikiran Soekarno, lihat John D. Legg, Sukarno: A Political Biography (London W1: Allen Lane The Penguin Press, 1972). Juga Sukarno, Sukarno An Autobiography as Told to Cindy Adams (Jakarta: Gunung Agung, 1966). Untuk melihat apakah “sosialisme-Indonesia” itu dilaksanakan dengan konsisten atau tidak, lihat Lance Castles, “The Fate of Private Entrepreneur”, dalam T. K. Tan, (ed.), Sukarno’s Guided Indonesia (Melbourne: The Jacaranda Press, 1967), hlm. 73-88.

Uraian lengkap tentang ini, lihat Wahyuni Nafis, Cak Nur, Sang Guru Bangsa (Jakarta: PT Kompas Media Nusantara, 2014). Juga Ahmad Gayus AF, Api Islam: Nurcholish Madjid, Jalan Hidup Seorang Visioner (Jakarta: Kompas, 2010).